In 2 dimensions, the most efficient packing mechanism is an array of hexagons - a honeycomb. In 1887, William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) asked the question 'What is the most efficient 3-D packing system?â€ś
See (the original paper) : On the Division of Space with Minimla Partitional Area
He suggested that it was the 'bi-truncated cubic honeycomb' which, until 1993, was widely recognised as the most efficient possible.
It was succeeded, however, by the Weaireâ€“Phelan Structure (see Wikipedia) - found by computerised simulations of foam generation - which is currently the most efficient form yet found.
The question of whether the Weaireâ€“Phelan Structure is the most efficient 3-D packing structure - having the smallest surface area per cell - is however still open. Subsequent mathematical simulations suggest that it is optimal - but this remains unproven.
Also see :
Ideas for new topics, and suggested additions / corrections for older ones, are always welcome.
If you have skills or interests in a particular field, and have suggestions for Wikenigma, get in touch !
Or, if you'd like to become a regular contributor . . . request a login password. Registered users can edit the entire content of the site, and also create new pages.
( The 'Notes for contributors' section in the main menu has further information and guidelines etc.)
You are currently viewing an auto-translated version of Wikenigma
Please be aware that no automatic translation engines are 100% accurate, and so the auto-translated content will very probably feature errors and omissions.
Nevertheless, Wikenigma hopes that the translated content will help to attract a wider global audience.